Numerique
In the current state of information technology, database consultation and exploitation contracts have become common practice. However, these processes involve complex legal agreements that must be incorporated into a database contract.
Reading time:
4 min
In the current state of information technology, database consultation and exploitation contracts have become common practice. However, these processes involve complex legal agreements that must be incorporated into a database contract.
This article aims to shed light on the key points to consider in the drafting and implementation of these contracts.
Legal Protection of Databases
The legal protection of databases is complex and based primarily on two rights: copyright (Articles L. 111-1 et seq. of the Intellectual Property Code) and the sui generis right (Articles L. 341-1 et seq. of the Intellectual Property Code).
Copyright protects the organization and structure of the database.
The sui generis right, for its part, protects the investment made to collect, verify and present the data.
These two rights may overlap. The European institutions have in fact chosen to overlap these rights for the protection of databases. This overlap can, however, create complex situations and requires anticipated contractual management to avoid conflicts (database contract).
It is therefore essential to clearly define the ownership of rights when drafting database consultation and exploitation contracts. Clarity and contractual anticipation are the keys to ensuring the legal certainty of the parties involved.
Obtaining the Necessary Authorizations
The exploitation of databases requires specific authorizations, with three key players: the author, the producer, and the user.
The producer must obtain the author's authorization to exploit the database. This permission, and its scope, must be formalized in a usage contract, generally structured as a subscription.
This contract must clarify the number of authorized users, the duration of the subscription, the means of access, and the cost.
If the database contains works protected by copyright, the producer must obtain the authorization of the author or their successor in title to avoid penalties for infringement.
The Consultation Contract
In addition to authors' authorizations, the producer must take into account other legal obligations, such as respect for the right to privacy, the right to one's image, and personal data law. They must also comply with sui generis rights if the data comes from another database.
The scope of the authorization depends on the contract and the assignment clause, which may be exclusive or non-exclusive. This determines whether the works in the database may be exploited elsewhere, and whether the producer may prohibit their exploitation by a third party.
When the database is ready to be exploited, the producer may authorize extraction and reutilization rights.
An absence of authorization may result in penalties for infringement.
In terms of contracting, the producer may grant a simple access right or authorize the extraction and reutilization of the data.
However, it should be noted that there are legal limits to what a producer may prohibit. For example, they cannot prohibit the acts necessary to access the content of an electronic database for the purposes and within the limits provided for by the contract.
Exploitation of the Database by the User
The freedom to use databases is restricted by the 1996 European directive for those protected by copyright or the sui generis right (database contract).
For unprotected databases, usage restrictions may be imposed by the operator.
When a user intends to exploit a database, they must obtain a broader authorization than that necessary for mere consultation. This authorization must specify the terms of completeness and updating of the data.
It is the responsibility of the licensor to guarantee that the data in the database does not infringe the copyright or a sui generis right of a third party.
For a reutilization of the data, the user must be authorized to extract and reuse substantial parts of the database (database contract).
The exclusivity of the license will depend on the particular circumstances. As a general rule, exclusivity is not granted to a user who merely consults the database. Finally, to use the data for commercial purposes, explicit authorization must be granted.
* * *
In summary, the consultation and exploitation of databases require precise and detailed legal expertise.
Understanding the subtleties of copyright, the sui generis right, and establishing a meticulous contract are crucial elements for navigating this complex and dynamic environment.
Don't wait any longer, make sure your database contracts are legally sound and tailored to your specific needs. Contact me today!
To learn more
A database may be protected by two cumulative rights: copyright, which protects the originality of its structure and organization, and the sui generis right, which protects the investment made to collect, verify and present the data. This overlap is provided for by the Intellectual Property Code.
The sui generis right, provided for in Articles L341-1 et seq. of the Intellectual Property Code, protects the producer who has made a substantial investment to constitute the database. It allows them to prohibit the extraction or reutilization of a substantial part of the content, irrespective of any originality of the structure.
Exploitation involves three players: the author, the producer and the user. The producer must obtain the author's authorization to exploit the database, formalized in a contract specifying the number of users, the duration, the means of access and the cost. If the database contains protected works, the authorization of their authors is necessary.
It must specify the ownership of rights, the scope of the authorization (simple access, extraction, reutilization), its exclusive or non-exclusive nature, the number of users, the duration and the cost. It must also incorporate respect for privacy, the right to one's image and personal data when the database contains them.
An exclusive assignment prohibits the holder from exploiting the works elsewhere and allows the producer to prohibit their exploitation by third parties. A non-exclusive assignment leaves this possibility open. The choice between the two determines the extent of the producer's rights and the commercial value of the authorization granted.
The producer cannot prohibit everything. In particular, they cannot prevent the legitimate user from carrying out the acts necessary to access the content of the database and use it normally, within the limits of the contract. The sui generis right also has legal exceptions, for example for certain limited extractions.
The extraction or reutilization of a protected database without authorization exposes one to an infringement action, with damages and cessation of the exploitation. This is why the ownership of rights and the extent of authorizations must be clarified by contract before any exploitation, in order to legally secure the parties.
Because the overlap of copyright and the sui generis right creates complex situations, where several holders may coexist. Clearly defining, from the outset, who holds what and who can do what avoids subsequent conflicts and secures the exploitation. Contractual anticipation is the key to legal certainty.
Still have questions?
Our team is available!
Have a question?

Ressources
Aller plus loin