Economique
Protect your business against unfair practices and secure your commercial relationships: unfair competition, restrictive practices and significant imbalance.
Context
Competition law governs relationships between economic operators. It protects businesses against unfair conduct, but also imposes strict rules on them in their commercial relationships. Unfair competition, disparagement, free-riding, poaching, abrupt termination of established commercial relationships, significant imbalance: all of these are situations where the law offers leverage, but also creates risks.
For a business, mastering this framework means both knowing how to defend itself against a competitor acting unfairly, and securing its own practices so as not to expose itself to penalties or liability claims.
Problem
Businesses face two types of risk. The first is being subjected to an unfair practice: a competitor that disparages, copies, free-rides or poaches, or a partner that abruptly terminates an established relationship. Without a swift response and solid evidence, the harm takes hold and becomes difficult to remedy.
The second is unknowingly exposing oneself: imposing unbalanced clauses on partners, terminating a contract without sufficient notice, drafting an unenforceable non-compete clause. These mistakes, often made in good faith, can lead to liability claims and substantial awards. Competition law therefore requires vigilance in both directions.
Solutions
I work on both sides of competition law: defending your interests against unfair conduct and securing your own commercial practices.
On the defence side, I analyse your situation, help you build a solid evidentiary case and first favour the amicable route, formal notice and negotiation, before initiating litigation where necessary to obtain cessation of the disturbance and compensation for your harm.
On the prevention side, I audit your contracts and practices to identify risks: unbalanced clauses, insufficient notice, fragile non-compete clauses. I secure your commercial relationships to keep you from becoming the target of a claim. In every case, my goal is to protect your competitive position.
I analyse your situation: the nature of the facts, your competitive position, the evidence available and the objectives pursued. Whether you are the victim or the party being challenged, this assessment defines the most appropriate strategy and the chances of success of each option.
I help you build a solid evidentiary case: bailiff's reports, witness statements, exchanges, investigative measures. As the quality of the evidence is decisive in unfair competition matters, this step largely determines the outcome of the case.
I first favour the amicable route where it is relevant: formal notice, negotiation, settlement. This approach often makes it possible to stop the disturbance quickly and obtain compensation without the delays and uncertainties of a trial.
When litigation becomes necessary, I represent you before the competent courts: summary proceedings for urgent measures, an action on the merits for compensation of the harm. I defend your interests to obtain cessation of the disturbance and full compensation.
FAQ
Unfair competition refers to wrongful conduct between economic operators, sanctioned on the basis of civil liability. It mainly covers four cases: disparagement (discrediting a competitor), confusion (creating a risk of confusion with a competitor), free-riding (placing oneself in another's wake to benefit from their efforts) and disorganisation (mass poaching, diversion of customers). Proving the fault, the harm and the causal link is essential.
The French Commercial Code sanctions the abrupt termination, even partial, of an established commercial relationship without complying with a written notice period that takes into account the duration of the relationship. This action allows the victim business to obtain compensation for the harm suffered as a result of the abruptness of the termination. It is one of the most frequent commercial disputes: the length of the notice period and the assessment of the harm are at the heart of the debate.
Significant imbalance sanctions the act of subjecting a commercial partner to obligations creating a manifest imbalance between the rights and obligations of the parties. This concept targets unfair clauses between professionals, often in relationships with partners in a dominant position. It can result in the nullity of the clauses concerned and in penalties. Framework agreements and general terms must be reviewed in this light.
Evidence is often the decisive point. The wrongful conduct, the harm suffered and the link between the two must be established. The means include bailiff's reports, witness statements, written exchanges, market analyses and, in certain cases, investigative measures ordered by the judge. Speed in gathering evidence is crucial, because unfair conduct leaves traces that can disappear. A solid evidentiary strategy determines the success of the action.
No. To be valid, a non-compete clause must be limited in time, in space and as to the activity covered, and proportionate to the legitimate interests to be protected. In certain contexts, particularly in employment law, financial consideration is required. A clause that is too broad or that lacks the required conditions may be voided. Drafting such clauses therefore demands great precision so that they are genuinely enforceable.
The diversion of customers, the poaching of employees or the use of confidential information may constitute unfair competition, even in the absence of a non-compete clause. It all depends on the methods used: freedom of trade permits competition, but not wrongful conduct. Swift action, supported by solid evidence, makes it possible to stop the disturbance and obtain compensation.
Prevention starts with an audit of your contracts and practices: general terms, distribution agreements, notice clauses, termination procedures, balance of relationships with your partners. Identifying at-risk clauses upstream (significant imbalance, insufficient notice) avoids being subjected to a claim. This is particularly important for businesses in a dominant position vis-à-vis their partners.
The duration varies according to the complexity and the route chosen. Summary proceedings make it possible to quickly obtain urgent measures (cessation of the disturbance, protective measures). An action on the merits, which definitively settles the dispute and sets the damages, takes longer. In many cases, a negotiated or settlement outcome makes it possible to resolve the dispute more quickly and in a controlled manner.
Nous accompagnons les entreprises de la tech et du commerce avec une double compétence juridique et technique, de l'analyse à la mise en œuvre.
Ressources
Need to secure a contract, manage compliance, or anticipate a dispute? Our first meeting is designed to understand your needs and clearly explain how we can help.
Digital and Distribution Law Attorney, Paris Bar. We secure your contracts, data, and business.
Services
Sectors
