RGPD

Transfer of personal data to the United States possible again

The United States offers an adequate level of protection for personal data transferred from EU companies to the United States. It is in this sense that, on 11 July, the European Commission adopted its adequacy decision for the EU-US Data Privacy Framework.

Contents
Schedule a discussion

Reading time:

3 min

The United States offers an adequate level of protection for personal data transferred from EU companies to the United States. It is in this sense that, on 11 July, the European Commission adopted its adequacy decision for the EU-US Data Privacy Framework.

The decision follows the signing by the United States of a presidential executive order to strengthen protections for American intelligence activities, in response to the concerns raised by the Court of Justice of the EU in its "Schrems II" judgment.

In particular, measures have been put in place to limit the access of American intelligence agencies to data that is necessary and proportionate, and to establish an independent mechanism to resolve the complaints of Europeans regarding the collection of their data for national security purposes.

If you would like to learn more, do not hesitate to contact me to discuss with a GDPR lawyer.

  1. What is an adequacy decision?

An adequacy decision, provided for by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), allows the transfer of personal data from the EU to third countries that offer a level of protection comparable to that of the EU. Following such decisions, data can flow freely and securely from the European Economic Area (EEA) to a third country, without additional conditions or authorisations.

  1. What are the criteria for assessing adequacy?

Adequacy does not require the data protection system of the third country to be identical to that of the EU, but is based on the principle of "essential equivalence".

This involves an overall assessment of the country's data protection framework, including the available oversight and redress mechanisms.

  1. What is the EU-US Data Privacy Framework?

In its adequacy decision, the Commission carefully assessed the requirements of the EU-US Framework, as well as the limitations and safeguards applicable when data transferred to the United States is accessed by American public authorities, in particular for the enforcement of criminal law and national security.

  1. What are the limitations and safeguards concerning access to data by American intelligence agencies?

A key element of the adequacy decision concerns the presidential executive order that introduces safeguards to limit access to data by American intelligence authorities to what is necessary and proportionate to protect national security, and to establish an independent and impartial redress mechanism.

  1. What is the new redress mechanism in the area of national security and how can individuals use it?

The American government has put in place a new two-tier redress mechanism, with an independent and binding authority, to handle and resolve complaints concerning the collection and use of their data by American intelligence agencies.

  1. When will the decision enter into force?

The adequacy decision entered into force upon its adoption on 11 July.

It will be reviewed regularly, with a first review one year after its entry into force.

  1. What is the impact of the decision on the possibility of using other tools for data transfers to the United States?

All the safeguards put in place by the American government in the area of national security apply to all data transfers under the GDPR to companies in the United States, regardless of the transfer mechanism used.

* * *

In conclusion, the EU-US adequacy decision on the protection of personal data strengthens the security and rights of individuals.

However, its implementation and understanding require specific expertise.

If you process personal data between the EU and the United States, it is crucial to be properly advised.

Do not wait any longer and contact a GDPR lawyer today to guarantee optimal compliance and secure your data transfers.

To learn more

Is the transfer of data to the United States authorised again?

Yes. On 11 July, the European Commission adopted an adequacy decision for the EU-US Data Privacy Framework, considering that the United States offers an adequate level of protection for data transferred from the EU. Transfers to certified American companies are facilitated once again.

What is an adequacy decision?

Provided for by the GDPR, it is a decision of the European Commission recognising that a third country offers a level of data protection comparable to that of the EU. It then allows data to flow freely to that country without any additional condition or authorisation.

On what criteria is adequacy based?

Adequacy does not require a system identical to that of the EU, but an essential equivalence. The Commission assesses the country's protection framework as a whole, including its oversight and redress mechanisms, to verify that the rights of individuals are effectively protected there.

What connection does it have with the Schrems II judgment?

The decision follows the concerns of the Court of Justice of the EU in the Schrems II judgment. The United States signed an executive order strengthening protections relating to intelligence activities, in response to these criticisms, which enabled the adoption of the new adequacy decision.

What safeguards have been put in place on the American side?

Measures limit the access of American intelligence agencies to data to what is necessary and proportionate, and an independent mechanism has been created to handle the complaints of Europeans concerning the collection of their data for national security purposes.

Can my company freely transfer data to the United States?

The transfer is facilitated to American companies adhering to the framework, but their certification must be verified and transfers must continue to be documented. GDPR compliance remains required for the other aspects of processing. A point of vigilance remains regarding the qualification of the recipients.

Can this decision be called into question?

The previous adequacy decisions concerning the United States have already been invalidated by the European courts. It is therefore prudent to follow legal developments and to retain alternative transfer mechanisms, in order not to depend exclusively on this decision.

How can data transfers outside the EU be secured?

By identifying the transfers, verifying the existence of an adequacy decision or by relying on other safeguards (standard contractual clauses, binding corporate rules), and by documenting everything. GDPR support makes it possible to secure these flows and anticipate developments in the legal framework.

Still have questions?

Our team is available!

Have a question?

Your information will remain strictly confidential.
Thank you! We will get back to you shortly. If you'd like to speed things up, schedule a time with me directly here:
Schedule a 15-minute call
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Homme en costume bleu foncé avec cravate et pochette blanche, bras croisés, regardant vers l'avant.

Ressources

Aller plus loin

00
article(s) affiché(s) sur
00

17 min

GTC of Use and GTC of Sale: differences, articulation and mistakes to avoid to secure your digital business
For any director of a digital company, e-merchant, platform publisher or online service provider, the General Terms of Use (GTU) and the General Terms and Conditions of Sale (GTC) constitute the daily contractual foundation of the business. Yet these two documents are the subject of

4 min

Logistics penalties: how to challenge them effectively?
How can suppliers effectively challenge the logistics penalties imposed by retailers in the event of contractual breaches?

5 min

Artificial intelligence and public services: review of the CNIL's "sandbox"
Artificial intelligence (AI) is set to profoundly transform public services, and the Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL) is establishing itself as a key player in this evolution. With its innovative sandbox programme, the CNIL provides support

15 min

Pre-contractual disclosure document (DIP) in franchising: mandatory content before signing
Joining a franchise network is a strategic step for many entrepreneurs. Before committing sometimes several hundred thousand euros and signing a contract that may run for five, seven or ten years, the law requires the franchisor to provide a pre-contractual disclosure docu

16 min

Termination of established commercial relationships: anticipating litigation
In business life, ending a commercial partnership is a strategic decision that any executive may have to take. Yet terminating a commercial relationship without precaution exposes the company to severe financial consequences. The abrupt termination of established commercial

5 min

International SEO: the legal specificities to incorporate into your contracts
In a globalised economy, many companies seek to extend their digital presence beyond national borders. This digital expansion inevitably requires an international SEO strategy tailored to the various target markets. However, this ambition
Book an appointment
Book an appointment📆 15-Min Meeting