IT projects often represent major investments for companies, but many fail.
IT projects often represent substantial investments for companies, both in financial and organizational terms. And yet, according to industry statistics, almost 70% of these projects run into significant difficulties, or fail to fully achieve their objectives.
Faced with these project failures, what legal options are available to aggrieved companies? An exploration of possible remedies.
If you would like to retain the services of an IT litigation lawyer, contact me!
Common signs of IT project failure
There are many ways in which an IT project can go wrong. The most frequently encountered situations include significant budget overruns, considerable delivery delays, missing or non-compliant functionalities, or performance problems rendering the solution unusable under real-life conditions.
These malfunctions can have serious consequences for the client company: loss of business opportunities, internal disorganization, damage to image, or even business interruption in extreme cases. The financial stakes are often considerable, far exceeding the cost of the initial project.
The legal framework applicable to IT service providers
The relationship between a company and its IT service provider generally takes the form of a service contract or a specific development contract. These contracts are governed by the general law of obligations, but also by specific provisions relating to the IT field.
The IT service provider is bound by several types of obligations:
An obligation of means concerning the development process, implying that it implements all the resources necessary to achieve the desired result.
An obligation of result on certain technical aspects precisely defined in the specifications, such as essential functionalities or minimum expected performance.
Obligations to provide information and advice throughout the project, requiring the service provider to alert the customer to potential risks and propose appropriate solutions.
In the event of a breach of these obligations, the service provider's contractual liability may be engaged, opening the way to various types of recourse for the victimized company. At this stage, the intervention of an IT litigation lawyer often becomes essential to assess the legal options available and define the best strategy to adopt.
Assessing the damage suffered
Before taking any action, it is essential to carry out a precise assessment of the damage suffered by the company. This assessment must take several dimensions into account:
Direct material loss, corresponding to the sums invested in the project without obtaining the expected result (development costs, licenses, dedicated hardware).
Commercial loss, linked to the loss of business opportunities or the deterioration of customer relations.
Organizational damage, resulting from internal disorganization and the mobilization of teams on an unfinished project.
Transition costs to an alternative solution, including data migration, team training and process adaptation.
This assessment is a key element in determining the litigation strategy and setting compensation claims. A precise, documented quantification of the loss considerably strengthens the company's position in negotiations or before the courts.
The pre-litigation stages: towards an amicable resolution
Before considering legal action, several pre-litigation steps can be taken to try and resolve the dispute amicably:
A formal notice is generally the first formal step. This letter, ideally drafted with the help of a specialist in IT litigation, sets out precisely the shortcomings observed and asks the service provider to remedy them within a specified timeframe.
Direct negotiation can then be undertaken to find common ground. This can lead to various solutions, such as correcting defects, reducing the price, or setting a new delivery schedule.
Mediation, a voluntary and confidential process, involves a neutral third party to facilitate the search for an agreement. This approach has the advantage of preserving the business relationship while enabling a rapid, customized resolution to the conflict.
Independent technical expertise can also be called upon to objectivize malfunctions and their origins. The conclusions of this expertise will serve as a factual basis for discussions or, if necessary, for subsequent legal proceedings.
These pre-litigation steps often lead to the conclusion of a settlement agreement, which formalizes the agreement between the parties and prevents any future litigation over the same facts.
Legal recourse in the event of failure to reach an amicable settlement
When attempts at amicable resolution fail, there are several legal remedies available to the company that has been the victim of a failed IT project:
The purpose of theenforcement action is to compel the service provider to respect its contractual commitments, in particular the delivery of promised functionalities or the correction of identified anomalies.
Thecontractual liability action allows you to claim damages to compensate for the loss suffered as a result of the service provider's failure to meet its obligations.
In the event of a serious breach of contract, the contract may be terminated by the courts, leading to the repayment of sums paid and compensation for damages suffered.
Summary proceedings offer a rapid solution for putting an end to a manifestly unlawful disturbance or preventing imminent damage, such as the delivery of source codes in the event of project stoppage.
In certain situations, a legal expert can be appointed to establish the technical causes of the failure and quantify the resulting damage.
The procedural specifics of IT litigation
Computer disputes have a number of special features that influence the course of legal proceedings:
The technical complexity of the cases often requires in-depth investigation and the involvement of experts to enlighten the court.
The international dimension of many projects can raise questions of applicable law and competent jurisdiction, particularly with the rise of cloud solutions and foreign service providers.
The preservation of digital evidence is of crucial importance, requiring special precautions to guarantee its integrity and probative value.
The confidentiality of commercial and technical information must be preserved throughout the procedure, which may require specific measures such as in camera sessions or restricted access to certain documents.
Faced with these specificities, the support of a professional who masters both the legal aspects and the technical stakes proves to be decisive for the efficient management of an IT dispute.
Preventive strategies to limit the risk of failure
In addition to the remedies available in the event of failure, companies can implement several preventive strategies to limit risks right from the project design stage:
Careful drafting of contracts and specifications, with precise definition of deliverables, acceptance criteria and the responsibilities of each party.
Implementation of appropriate project governance, including validation milestones, regular steering committees and escalation processes in the event of difficulties.
The adoption of an agile methodology enabling progressive validation of developments and early detection of deviations from expectations.
Independent technical audits at key stages of the project to verify the quality of deliverables and compliance with industry standards.
These preventive measures, combined with constant vigilance during project execution, are the first line of defense against the risk of failure.
The importance of a rapid, structured response
When faced with a derailed IT project, the speed and appropriateness of the customer's response are decisive in maximizing its chances of obtaining redress. The earlier the intervention, the greater the chances of recovery or compensation.
Experience has shown that companies which rigorously document malfunctions, formalize their complaints and quickly seek advice generally obtain more favorable results, whether in the context of an amicable resolution or a contentious procedure.
In all cases, the complexity of IT disputes and the considerable financial stakes involved fully justify the use of legal expertise to effectively defend the interests of the victimized company.
